The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) energy guide, Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the U.S. Iron and Steel Industry, discusses energy efficiency practices and technologies that can be implemented in iron and steel manufacturing plants. This guide provides current real world examples of iron and steel plants saving energy and reducing cost and carbon dioxide emissions.
Bottom Stirring/Stirring Gas Injection
This technique consists of injecting an inert gas in the bottom of the EAF to increase the heat transfer in the melt. In addition, increased interaction leads to an increased liquid metal yield of 0.5%. Furnaces with oxygen injection are sufficiently turbulent, reducing the need for inert gas stirring.
Development Status | Products |
---|---|
Commercial
|
EAF Steel
|
Bottom Stirring/Stirring Gas InjectionCosts & Benefits
Parent Process: Electric Arc Furnace | |
---|---|
Energy Savings Potential |
Electricity savings can vary between 12 to 24 kWh, or 0.07 GJ, per ton of steel. |
CO2 Emission Reduction Potential |
Emissions saving potential of the technology is 11.7 kg CO2/t-steel. |
Costs |
Retroftit capital cost is $0.94/t-steel. |
Bottom Stirring/Stirring Gas Injection Publications
Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the U.S. Iron and Steel Industry
http://www.energystar.gov/ia/business/industry/Iron_Steel_Guide.pdf?25eb-abc5
Page Number:
93
Available and Emerging Technologies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Iron and Steel Industry
http://www.epa.gov/nsr/ghgdocs/ironsteel.pdf
Page Number:
11