Ultra High Power (UHP) Transformers

Transformer losses can be as high as 7% of the electrical inputs. These losses will depend mainly on the sizing and age of the transformer. Converting the furnace operation to higher power, or more specifically to ultra-high power (UHP), increases productivity and reduces energy losses. The increased power can be reached by installing new transformers or paralleling existing transformers. The UHP operation may lead to heat fluxes and increased refractory wear, making cooling of the furnace panels necessary. This results in heat losses that partially offset the power savings.

In a French plant the operating voltage increased from 600V to 660V in one furnace and from 400V to 538V in the second. In turn the power delivered by the electrodes at both furnaces increased. Electrode spraying was introduced as a cooling method. The higher power delivered has decreased the power on time by 7 and 14 minutes leading to a productivity increased by 7 ton of crude steel per hour. The electrode consumption decreased by 0.1 kg/t and 0.5kg/tThe new transformer system also increased the transformer reactance and made it possible to obtain a higher stability of the electric arc (Worrell et al, 2010. p. 91). 
 

Development Status Products
Commercial

Ultra High Power (UHP) TransformersCosts & Benefits

Parent Process: Electric Arc Furnace
Energy Savings Potential

Electricity savings are estimated to be 1.1 kWh/t-steel for every MW power increase.
Power consumption dropped by 11 and 22kWh/t respectively for 2 furnace lines when operating voltage increased from 600V to 660V in one furnace and from 400V to 538V in another (Worrell et al, 2010. p. 91). 

CO2 Emission Reduction Potential

US flag Emission reductions are estimated to be in the range of 10 kg/t-steel (US EPA, 2010. p. 11).. 

Costs

To increase the operating voltage  from 600V to 660V in one furnace and from 400V to 538V in another a $1.1 million investment was made (Worrell et al, 2010. p. 91). 

.Capital costs were estimated to be $3.9/ton ($4.3/tonne). The payback time is estimated as 5.2 years (US EPA, 2010. p. 33).

 

Ultra High Power (UHP) Transformers Publications

Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the U.S. Iron and Steel Industry

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) energy guide, Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the U.S. Iron and Steel Industry, discusses energy efficiency practices and technologies that can be implemented in iron and steel manufacturing plants. This guide provides current real world examples of iron and steel plants saving energy and reducing cost and carbon dioxide emissions.

Page Number: 

91

Available and Emerging Technologies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Iron and Steel Industry

Page Number: 

11, 33